How does medical cannabis compare with treatments you have already tried?
The question people actually ask is whether this works better than the thing they are already on. The honest answer starts with an inconvenient fact: almost nobody has run that trial.
The short answer
- Head-to-head trials barely exist. Nearly all evidence compares cannabis-based medicines with placebo, not with another treatment.
- That makes better than a claim nobody can support from the published evidence, in either direction.
- Standard treatments come first — by guideline, and by the convention that two have been tried.
- NICE recommends against cannabis-based medicines for chronic pain outside a clinical trial.
- Never stop an existing medicine to make room for this. That is a decision for the prescriber who started it.
Why there is no clean answer
Comparative effectiveness requires a trial that randomises people between two active treatments. For cannabis-based medicines against the standard options, those trials have almost never been run.
What exists instead is a set of placebo-controlled trials of varying quality for cannabis-based medicines, and a separate set for the established treatments. Comparing across two different bodies of evidence, with different populations, outcome measures and durations, is not the same as comparing the treatments.
So when a clinic, a forum or an AI answer tells you one is better than the other, that is an inference rather than a finding. The useful comparison is narrower and more personal: what have you tried, what happened, and what is left.
Nerve pain, against gabapentinoids and antidepressants
For neuropathic pain, NICE recommends offering a choice of amitriptyline, duloxetine, gabapentin or pregabalin, and switching if the first does not work or is not tolerated. Cannabis-based medicines are not in that recommendation.
The Cochrane review of cannabis-based medicines for chronic neuropathic pain found that they may increase the number of people achieving substantial pain relief compared with placebo, while also increasing withdrawals due to adverse events, and rated the evidence low to very low quality. That is a genuine signal in a difficult condition, and it is not a demonstration of superiority over an established option.
What that Cochrane review actually concluded
Mücke M, Phillips T, Radbruch L, Petzke F, Häuser W. Cannabis-based medicines for chronic neuropathic pain in adults. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2018. The authors judged the potential benefits to be outweighed for many people by the potential harms, and the quality of evidence to be low.
The condition pages go further: neuropathic pain, sciatica and fibromyalgia.
Trauma, against the psychological therapies
For post-traumatic stress disorder, NICE recommends trauma-focused psychological therapies, including trauma-focused cognitive behavioural therapy and eye movement desensitisation and reprocessing. These have a substantially stronger evidence base than any drug treatment for PTSD.
There is no trial comparing a cannabis-based medicine with a trauma-focused therapy, and the two are not really alternatives: a medicine that helps with sleep or hyperarousal does not do what a trauma-focused therapy does.
In practice a careful specialist will ask whether you have been able to access a recommended therapy at all, because waiting lists rather than treatment failure are often the real obstacle. That is a reason to help you get the therapy, not a reason to substitute for it.
More detail is in medical cannabis for PTSD.
Sleep, against sleeping tablets and CBT for insomnia
For long-term insomnia, cognitive behavioural therapy for insomnia is the first-line treatment, and hypnotic medicines are recommended only for short periods because of tolerance and dependence.
People often arrive having used a hypnotic for far longer than intended, which is a real problem and one a specialist will take seriously. It is worth knowing that tolerance and dependence are not unique to hypnotics: they are relevant to cannabis-based medicines too, which is why treatment is reviewed rather than simply repeated.
See medical cannabis for sleep disorders and tolerance, dependence and stopping treatment.
What if nothing else has worked?
That is the situation the UK system is actually designed around, and it is a reasonable position to be in. It is also the point at which the honest framing matters most, because hope and evidence are easy to confuse.
Having exhausted the standard options makes you the kind of patient a specialist can consider, since the convention is that two standard treatments have been tried. It does not make a cannabis-based medicine likely to work, and a specialist who tells you it will is telling you something the evidence does not support.
What a good consultation produces is a clear-eyed view of the odds for your condition, an explicit plan for how long to try and how the result will be judged, and a willingness to stop if it is not helping.
The general requirements are covered in What are the requirements?
Frequently asked questions
Is medical cannabis better than pregabalin for nerve pain?
No published trial compares them directly, so neither answer can be supported from the evidence. NICE recommends amitriptyline, duloxetine, gabapentin or pregabalin for neuropathic pain; the Cochrane review of cannabis-based medicines found low-quality evidence of benefit over placebo alongside more withdrawals for side effects.
How does medical cannabis compare with EMDR for trauma?
They are not comparable treatments, and no trial has compared them. NICE recommends trauma-focused psychological therapies including EMDR for PTSD, and their evidence base is considerably stronger than that for any drug treatment.
Is it worth trying when nothing else has worked?
That is the situation specialists assess, and having tried the standard options is normally a precondition. It is not a prediction that it will work. A good specialist will set out the odds for your condition and agree in advance how the trial of treatment will be judged.
Should I stop my current medicine first?
No. Stopping an existing medicine is a decision for the clinician who prescribed it, and some cannot be stopped abruptly. Tell the specialist everything you take, including anything bought over the counter.
Sources and further reading
Every factual statement on this page is drawn from the following public sources. Links open in a new tab and are not affiliated with Flora House.
- NICE guideline CG173: Neuropathic pain in adults — pharmacological management
- Mücke M, et al. Cannabis-based medicines for chronic neuropathic pain in adults. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (2018)
- NICE guideline NG116: Post-traumatic stress disorder
- NICE guideline NG193: Chronic pain (primary and secondary) in over 16s
- NICE guideline NG144: Cannabis-based medicinal products
- NHS: Medical cannabis (and cannabis oils)
- MHRA: The supply, manufacture, importation and distribution of unlicensed cannabis-based products for medicinal use